Read the official wording and decide for yourself. Check which city or district each local question applies to.
County & local ballot questions
City, school and special-district questions apply only to the voters identified below.
Town of BelleairTownwide
Charter Amendment 1 · Planning and Zoning Board
Who votes: Registered voters in the Town of Belleair only.
Removes a separate charter requirement to appoint a planning and zoning board; state law still requires a local planning agency.
YES Removes the charter requirement.
NO Keeps the existing charter requirement.
Official ballot wording
Shall Section 5.04 of the Charter for the Town of Belleair be amended to remove the requirement that the Town Commission appoint a planning and zoning board because the language is unnecessary since Florida law requires the Town to appoint a local planning agency?
Who votes: Registered voters in the Town of Belleair only.
Moves the month for establishing the Charter Review Committee from June to May, beginning in 2036.
YES Starts the committee in May.
NO Keeps the June start.
Official ballot wording
Shall Section 10.01 of the Charter for the Town of Belleair be amended to change the month the Charter Review Committee is established from June to May beginning in 2036 thereby providing the Charter Review Committee sufficient time to perform its duties and provide the Town with the time necessary to meet Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections deadlines allowing proposed amendments to be on the ballot for the general election the following November?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of Largo only.
Makes candidate petitions available March 15 in regular city-election years; the commission would set the date for special elections.
YES Adopts the revised petition schedule in Ordinance 2025-24.
NO Keeps the existing charter schedule.
Official ballot wording
Shall section 7.02(a) of the City of Largo Charter be amended to change the date that petitions for candidates for Mayor and City Commission are first available to March 15 of each year of a regular city election, or a date selected by the City Commission for a special election, all as more fully described in Ordinance No. 2025-24?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of Madeira Beach only.
Moves regular municipal elections from March to November alongside the state General Election.
YES Moves the regular election to November.
NO Keeps the current March schedule.
Official ballot wording
Shall the City of Madeira Beach Charter be amended to change the date of regular municipal elections from March to November, so City elections occur in conjunction with the State General Election?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of Madeira Beach only.
Moves the two-week candidate qualifying period from December to June to align with November municipal elections.
YES Adopts the June qualifying period.
NO Keeps the current December period.
Official ballot wording
Shall the City of Madeira Beach Charter be amended to change the municipal candidate qualifying period from the first two full weeks in December, excluding weekends, to the first two full weeks in June, excluding weekends, to align with the revised November Municipal General Election schedule?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of Madeira Beach only.
Temporarily extends Districts 3 and 4 through certification of the November 2027 results, and Districts 1 and 2 and the Mayor-Commissioner through certification of November 2028 results.
YES Approves these term extensions for the election-date transition.
NO Does not approve these extensions.
Official ballot wording
Shall the City Charter be amended to temporarily extend the terms of Commissioner District 3 and Commissioner District 4 until certification of the November 2027 election results; and the terms of Commissioner District 1, Commissioner District 2, and Mayor-Commissioner until certification of the November 2028 election results in order to implement the transition from March Municipal Elections to November Municipal General Elections?
Who votes: Registered voters in the Town of Redington Shores only.
Changes town commissioner terms from two years to three years.
YES Establishes three-year commissioner terms.
NO Keeps two-year commissioner terms.
Official ballot wording
Charter section 5 currently provides that the term of office for a Commissioner is two years. Should section 5 of the Charter be amended to convert terms of the Commissioners to three years?
Who votes: Registered voters in the Town of Redington Shores only.
If Referendum 1 passes, shortens only the mayor’s term following the 2027 election to two years to maintain staggered elections.
YES Approves the conditional, one-time two-year mayoral term.
NO Keeps the existing mayoral term provision.
Official ballot wording
Charter section 5 currently provides that the term of office for the Mayor is three years. If Referendum Question No. 1 passes extending the term of office for a Commissioner to three years should the Charter be amended to provide the term of office for the Mayor following the 2027 General Election only be two years to maintain staggered terms of office for the Mayor and Commissioners?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of St. Petersburg only.
Authorizes up to $600 million in general obligation bonds for storm resilience, wastewater and drinking-water improvements. Each issuance could mature over up to 30 years.
YES Authorizes the City to issue the bonds.
NO Does not authorize these bonds.
Financial effect: The bonds pledge the City’s full faith, credit and unlimited ad valorem (property) taxing power. The ballot text does not set a household tax bill.
Official ballot wording
Shall the City finance storm resilience improvements, including but not limited to, floodwater protection, stormwater pump stations, drainage infrastructure, as well as wastewater collection and treatment facilities, drinking water distribution and supply facilities, by issuing general obligation bonds in one or more series, not exceeding $600,000,000, bearing interest not exceeding maximum legal rates, maturing not more than 30 years from each issuance date, pledging the City's full faith, credit, and unlimited ad valorem taxing power?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of St. Petersburg only.
Removes nine vacant, city-owned lots from the Park and Waterfront Map, allowing separate future land-use changes and possible sale for affordable or workforce housing. Unity Park and the recreational open space are not removed.
YES Allows those lots to be removed from the protected map.
NO Keeps those lots on the map.
Official ballot wording
The City Charter Park and Waterfront Map contains a composite parcel identified as “Jamestown” composed of: Unity Park, recreational open space within Jamestown apartments, and nine City-owned lots in the adjacent neighborhood that are vacant and closed to the public. Shall the City Charter be amended to remove those nine vacant lots from the Map to allow subsequent / separate land use changes and potential sale of those lots for affordable or workforce housing?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of St. Petersburg only.
Allows a 30-year lease term and requires the tenant to add docks, boat lifts and restrooms under Ordinance 640-H. The City would own the improvements at lease end.
YES Authorizes the described lease amendment.
NO Does not authorize this lease amendment.
Financial effect: The specified tenant improvements would be constructed at no cost to the City, according to the ballot question.
Official ballot wording
May City Council approve amendment of the lease of City-owned submerged lands at Harborage Marina subject to conditions in ordinance 640-H? Such amendment would extend the term of the lease to 30 years and require the tenant to construct new improvements at no cost to the City, including 200 linear feet of docks, boat lifts, and expanded restrooms. Those improvements would be owned by the City at the end of the lease.
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of St. Petersburg only.
Raises the maximum Port of St. Petersburg lease term allowed without a citywide referendum from 10 to 25 years. It does not change the Port’s permitted use.
YES Allows leases up to 25 years without a referendum.
NO Keeps the existing 10-year threshold.
Official ballot wording
The City Charter currently limits leases at the Port of St. Petersburg to 10 years without approval by citywide referendum. Shall the Charter be amended to increase that limitation to 25 years? That amendment would make the Port consistent with adjacent Albert Whitted Airport and provide the City with additional flexibility to enter into agreements with private entities for redevelopment of Port facilities. That amendment would not change the permitted use of the Port.
Charter Amendment 3 · Even-year election provisions
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of St. Petersburg only.
Makes technical, clarifying and conforming charter changes to implement the even-year election schedule approved in 2022, including alignment of charter review.
YES Adopts the proposed conforming changes.
NO Does not adopt these changes.
Official ballot wording
In 2022, voters in a citywide referendum approved amendment of the City Charter to reschedule elections for Mayor and Council Members to even-numbered years so that City elections would align with national and state elections beginning in 2024. Shall the Charter be amended to make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes necessary and appropriate to fully effectuate the intent of the 2022 referendum, including alignment of the Charter-review process with the current election schedule?
Who votes: Registered voters in the City of Treasure Island only.
Requires approval by four members of the Board of Commissioners for planned developments or special area plans.
YES Requires the four-member supermajority.
NO Keeps the existing charter voting requirement.
Official ballot wording
Shall the Treasure Island City Charter Section 3.07(c) be amended to require that “a supermajority vote of four members of the board of commissioners shall be required for the approval of any planned developments or special area plans?” This provision will become effective immediately upon approval by the electors or as otherwise provided by law.
These three questions appear statewide. All Florida voters may vote on them.
Florida ConstitutionStatewide · Amendment 1
Budget Stabilization Fund
Raises the maximum Budget Stabilization Fund balance from 10% to 25% of general revenue. Requires annual transfers of the lesser of $750 million or the amount needed to reach 25%, subject to conditions; permits withdrawals for critical state needs.
YES Adopts the new reserve limit, transfer requirement and withdrawal authority.
NO Keeps the current constitutional reserve framework.
Official ballot wording
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to increase the amount of funds that may be retained in the budget stabilization fund from 10% to 25% of general revenue collections, require the legislature to transfer the lesser of $750 million or the amount required to reach 25% of the general revenue collections each year unless certain conditions are met, and allow the legislature to withdraw funds for critical state needs.
Exemption of Tangible Personal Property on Agricultural Land from Taxation
Exempts qualifying tangible personal property used for agriculture or agritourism on agricultural land from property tax, beginning with the 2027 tax year. The property must be owned by the landowner or leaseholder.
YES Creates the described tax exemption.
NO Does not create this exemption.
Official ballot wording
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to exempt tangible personal property habitually located or typically present on land classified as agricultural, used in the production of agricultural products or for agritourism activities, and owned by the landowner or leaseholder of the agricultural land from ad valorem taxation. If approved this amendment would first apply for tax years beginning January 1, 2027.
Increased Homestead Exemption; Lower Cap on Increases in Non-Homestead Property Assessments
Raises the homestead exemption for non-school taxes to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028, with inflation adjustments afterward. Reduces the annual assessment-growth cap for non-homestead property from 10% to 5%. Also changes local exemption procedures and permitted uses of local property-tax revenue.
YES Adopts the exemption, assessment-cap and related local-tax provisions.
NO Keeps the existing constitutional provisions.
Tax details: The increased exemption applies to non-school taxes. People who are not Florida residents on December 31, 2026 face a delayed increase as described in the full text. Effects differ by property and local government.
Official ballot wording
This amendment increases the homestead exemption, for all non-school taxes, to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028, and adjusts for inflation thereafter. It requires the Legislature to prescribe a uniform procedure for counties and municipalities, for their respective levies, to increase the homestead exemption up to full assessed value, and allows special districts, subject to referendum approval, to do the same.
Persons who are not Florida residents on December 31, 2026, will receive the existing homestead exemption upon qualifying for a homestead exemption, with the increased homestead exemption beginning with the fifth year of exemption, to the extent permitted by the U.S. Constitution.
This amendment reduces the annual cap on assessment increases for non-homestead properties from 10% to 5%.
This amendment requires counties and municipalities to use property taxes solely for public safety, education and schools, infrastructure, natural resources, bond debt service, retirement benefits for employees, and operations and administration.
Other expenditures may be approved by county officers or county or municipal governing bodies unless prohibited by general law, notwithstanding Article VII, Section 9(a) of the Florida Constitution, which allows counties and municipalities to levy property taxes for their respective purposes.